thoughts on information overload

Entries tagged as ‘digital curator’

Why we need content curators and who should do it

October 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

There may be more, but at as far as I can tell, the main reason we need to curate content is because of information overload, and the main factor that makes it possible is social media.

According to Steve Rubel,

Information overload makes it difficult to separate junk from art. It requires a certain finesse and expertise – a fine tuned, perhaps trained eye. Google, memetrackers such as Techmeme and social news sites like digg are not curators. They’re aggregators – and there’s a big difference.(-link)

According to the OLPC wiki page,

Comparison and critique of shared work leads naturally to grouping and curation

The current model assumes that digital content curators must be people driven to curate content. Again, according to Steve Rubel;

The call of the curator requires people who are selfless and willing to act as sherpas and guides. They’re identifiable subject matter experts who dive through mountains of digital information and distill it down to its most relevant, essential parts.

I for one, disagree with this view, which assumes there is some sort of collective action problem around curatnig content because the curated content is a public good. In short, a public good is one where the individual has little to no incentive to create because he cannot exclude other from using it and hence he cannot charge for it, so is all cost and very little benefit. That it is usually at the heart of collective action problems, where a group want to get a problem solved (let say consumer want a lower price from milk) but the insentives are rather low to organize in comparison to the counterpart (the small group of milk producers).There is of course a solution to the low incentives and that is to pay people to curate content the way Mahalo does. But, as I said, I don´t believe that content curation need to be treated like a public good.

On the contrary, I believe that since we all suffer from information overload, we all have an incentive to solve our little island of information overload. And what´s more, we would all gain from exchanging our own curated work because from it we gain a less costly access to other domains of information. In this issue the key is to make an  easy to use tool to curate content and a close to zero cost information exchange platform.

Of course, there will be some that will free ride, but their freeriding will be proportional to their information overload so my take is that it would be marginal.

The task then is to create the curating tools and the exchange platform in order to combat information overload by re organizing content.

Categories: Information overload · web
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

What´s cool and what´s not cool about Digg

August 7, 2008 · Leave a Comment

One of the coolest Digg.com features is the non duplicate control on submissions. The way it works is that Digg check submissions against already submitted content and sees if yours is significantly similar to anything that is already up. If it is, Digg will show you what that content is, letting you decide whether to post it or not. From that point on, Digg could put you on a watch list and match the submission (I have submission way too much, haven´t I?) against spam complains to “burry” the story or delete your account.

Duplicate content is all around us, including at Google. News search for example often return several links from different sources with the same news just because all of them are more popular (PageRank and all other criteria they might use) then the next news.  Digg solution to duplicate content makes it way more easy to read and digest.

What I don´t like about Digg is that It focuses on popularity rather than on quality of content and hence it is subject to gaming.

What Digg and Google have in common is that they are both content aggregators and those are not doing a great job at dealing with information overload.

Content needs a curator. Mahalo is a man powered army of curators focusing on various niches. Wikipedia is non profit venture on the same vein. Delicious is a curator of content sources but not of content. The question is whether content can be curated in both a decentralized as well as for profit way.

Categories: Information overload · web
Tagged: , ,