<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Mag.nolia and Reddit are going distribuited?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gheller.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/why-magnolia-and-reddit-are-going-distribuited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gheller.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/why-magnolia-and-reddit-are-going-distribuited/</link>
	<description>An effort to get my ideas straight on what the web is about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonathangheller</title>
		<link>http://gheller.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/why-magnolia-and-reddit-are-going-distribuited/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathangheller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gheller.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I agree. But wouldn&#039;t it be cool if Delicious - content curated, relevant information - could offer an alternative to the algorithm relevant info from search engines like google? of course, you wouldn&#039;t want it to turn into what you call a &quot;barometer of cool&quot;.  Perhaps  creating groups where you could &quot;walled&quot; content might do the trick: the info would be accessible the the wider Delicious audience (aggregated to the larger data  stream)  buy posting url&#039;s to the group would be restricted....who knows...


Anyway, thanks for commenting michu :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. But wouldn&#8217;t it be cool if Delicious &#8211; content curated, relevant information &#8211; could offer an alternative to the algorithm relevant info from search engines like google? of course, you wouldn&#8217;t want it to turn into what you call a &#8220;barometer of cool&#8221;.  Perhaps  creating groups where you could &#8220;walled&#8221; content might do the trick: the info would be accessible the the wider Delicious audience (aggregated to the larger data  stream)  buy posting url&#8217;s to the group would be restricted&#8230;.who knows&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for commenting michu <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michu</title>
		<link>http://gheller.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/why-magnolia-and-reddit-are-going-distribuited/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Michu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gheller.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I think for many Del.icio.us users the very fact that &quot;critical mass&quot; is not imminent- nor is it marketed to that effect - makes it work. Because more than social bookmarking, it achieves cultural aggregation and useful inter-linking, rather than being a user-generated version of meta-filter. Digg is more a barometer of cool. I&#039;ve found that delicious is actually useful, and will probably survive on its core group of academics et al. My point is: if widely adopted, it would probably transform into another digg. The success of the site depends on the user, but is success a matter of hits... or a matter of proper use of the technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for many Del.icio.us users the very fact that &#8220;critical mass&#8221; is not imminent- nor is it marketed to that effect &#8211; makes it work. Because more than social bookmarking, it achieves cultural aggregation and useful inter-linking, rather than being a user-generated version of meta-filter. Digg is more a barometer of cool. I&#8217;ve found that delicious is actually useful, and will probably survive on its core group of academics et al. My point is: if widely adopted, it would probably transform into another digg. The success of the site depends on the user, but is success a matter of hits&#8230; or a matter of proper use of the technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
